Brocklesby Park Cricket Club

Brocklesby Park against Woodhall Spa at Brocklesby Park on 04/05/1968


Innings of Woodhall Spa

Batsman How Out Fielder Bowler Score
1 M.Hazzard Bowled J.Henderson 50
2 G.Williams Caught J.Henderson PB.Burbidge 3
3 M.Parker Bowled J.Henderson 0
4 B.Brighton Caught J.Henderson PB.Burbidge 0
5 P.Allport Bowled J.Henderson 60
6 M.Ingham Bowled J.Henderson 6
7 N.Wiltshire Bowled J.Henderson 1
8 M.Pearson Bowled J.Henderson 5
9 T.Curtis Bowled J.Henderson 2
10 M.Goodson Bowled J.Henderson 0
11 S.Leggate Not Out 0
Extras 11
39.1 Overs Total 138 All Out
1 9 2 10 3 13 4 99 5 107
G.Williams M.Parker B.Brighton P.Allport M.Ingham
6 113 7 123 8 131 9 131 10 138
N.Wiltshire M.Pearson T.Curtis M.Goodson M.Hazzard

Bowling (6-ball Overs)

Bowler Overs Maidens Runs Wickets
1 J.Henderson 14.1 3 23 8
2 PB.Burbidge 7.0 2 21 2
3 MJH.Davey 5.0 0 23 0
4 Jim.Robinson 4.0 0 15 0
5 MCB.Burbidge 3.0 0 17 0
6 Bill.Margrave 6.0 0 28 0


Innings of Brocklesby Park

Batsman How Out Fielder Bowler Score
1 K.van den Bos Bowled S.Leggate 0
2 K.Roberts Bowled S.Leggate 9
3 M.Williams Bowled T.Curtis 5
4 Bill.Margrave Caught B.Brighton M.Goodson 19
5 JM.Greetham Bowled T.Curtis 9
6 Jim.Robinson Not Out 68
7 PB.Burbidge Caught S.Leggate M.Goodson 10
8 J.Henderson Not Out 17
9 MJH.Davey DNB -
10 MCB.Burbidge DNB -
11 KG.Smith DNB -
Extras 2
38.0 Overs Total 139/6
1 8 2 9 3 19 4 33 5 53
K.van den Bos K.Roberts M.Williams JM.Greetham Bill.Margrave
6 72 7 139 8 - 9 - 10 -
PB.Burbidge - - - -

Bowling (6-ball Overs)

Bowler Overs Maidens Runs Wickets
1 S.Leggate 10.0 3 27 2
2 M.Pearson 4.0 0 14 0
3 T.Curtis 11.0 2 25 2
4 M.Goodson 9.0 0 57 2
5 P.Allport 4.0 0 14 0


Brocklesby Park won by 4 wickets


Valid XHTML 1.1.
.Valid CSS!
Return to Index Page
Produced by Richard Bedwell on behalf of Brocklesby Park Cricket Club
This page took 0.21 seconds to generate on Saturday, 23 November 2024 at 03:22:32
Something is always wrong, Balders. The fact that I am not a millionaire aristocrat with the sexual capacity of a rutting rhino is a constant niggle. - Blackadder

3783