E Drinkell
(2011 - 2013)
Overall Batting Record
|
Mat |
Inn |
NO |
Runs |
Ave |
HS |
0 |
50 |
100 |
4s |
6s |
Ct |
St |
RO |
League | 2 |
2 |
0 |
124 |
62 |
110 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
5 |
2 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 2 |
2 |
0 |
124 |
62 |
110 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
5 |
2 | 0 | 0 |
Last 5 Matches
Opponents |
Where |
Type |
Score |
HO |
Result |
Date |
1 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
League |
14 |
Caught |
Holton-le-Clay won by 155 runs |
16/06/2013 |
2 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
League |
110 |
Bowled |
Holton-le-Clay won by 160 runs |
22/05/2011 |
Last 5 Seasons
|
Mat |
Inn |
NO |
Runs |
Ave |
HS |
0 |
50 |
100 |
4s |
6s |
Ct |
St |
RO |
2013 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
5 |
2 | 0 | 0 |
5 Highest Scores
Opponents |
Where |
Type |
Score |
HO |
Result |
Date |
1 |
Brocklesby Park | Holton-le-Clay |
League |
110 |
Bowled |
Holton-le-Clay won by 160 runs |
22/05/2011 |
2 |
Brocklesby Park | Holton-le-Clay |
League |
14 |
Caught |
Holton-le-Clay won by 155 runs |
16/06/2013 |
5 Highest Partnerships
Opponents |
Where |
Partner |
Stand |
Wicket |
Result |
Date |
1 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
L.Gash |
108 |
4 |
Holton-le-Clay won by 160 runs |
22/05/2011 |
2 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
P.Shawcross |
49 |
5 |
Holton-le-Clay won by 160 runs |
22/05/2011 |
3 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
P.Farmery |
15 |
3 |
Holton-le-Clay won by 160 runs |
22/05/2011 |
4 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
J.Latimer |
15 |
2 |
Holton-le-Clay won by 155 runs |
16/06/2013 |
5 |
Brocklesby Park |
Holton-le-Clay |
L.Gash |
13 |
3 |
Holton-le-Clay won by 155 runs |
16/06/2013 |
5 Highest Player Partnerships
How Dismissed
1 |
Bowled |
1 |
50% |
2 |
Caught |
1 |
50% |

.
.

This page took
0.33 seconds to generate on Sunday, 27 April 2025 at 04:40:30
Administered these days by businessmen who have no feel for, or genuine love and understanding of the game, cricket is played purely for money, ego and power for those who control it. - Jonathan Agnew